The price of a breach has changed
The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Act 2025 came into force on 21 August 2025. For offences committed after that date, the maximum fine under the RMA rose from $600,000 to $10 million for a company, and from $300,000 to $1 million for an individual.
The same Act made RMA fines and infringement fees uninsurable, and any existing policy that covers them no longer has effect. Insurance can still pay for legal defence and clean-up, but not for the fine itself.
The courts are busy. In Waikato alone, three farmers were fined for effluent discharges in the first half of 2026: $52,500, $56,000 and $39,000. The offending in all three cases happened before August 2025, so they were sentenced under the old maximums.
What the council expects you to show
Rules vary by region and by consent, so check with your own regional council. Waikato Regional Council's guidance on applying effluent to land gives a sense of the detail involved:
- No more than 25 mm per application, and less on higher-risk land
- No more than 150 kg of nitrogen per hectare per year from effluent on grazed grass
- No ponding after application, and no spreading on waterlogged soil
- A non-irrigated strip of at least 20 metres beside watercourses, and no spreading within 50 metres of a water supply
The council also says that if it asks, the person applying the effluent must be able to show these conditions were met.
That is easy to say and hard to do months later, when the question is which paddock got what, on which day, and with which machine. If the answer is in a diary in the cab or in the driver's memory, it won't stand up for long.
Contractors carry it on someone else's land
The pressure is sharpest for contractors who spread on their clients' paddocks. You do the work, the land is theirs, and both of you may have to account for it. In this industry a clear record protects both sides: it shows the client what was done, and it shows the council what wasn't.
What a record that stands up looks like
A record that will satisfy a council officer or a client needs to answer four questions:
- Where. The machine's actual path on the paddock, and proof that it stayed out of the setback strips.
- When. The date and time, plus evidence of conditions on the day.
- How much. The volume applied to each paddock.
- Who and with what. The operator, the tractor and the implement.
It has to be captured while the work is happening, not written up afterwards.
How FarmBackup keeps that record

The tractor records its own route. A GPS tracker wired to the vehicle logs its position continuously, and nobody has to remember to switch it on. Any day's work can be replayed on the map afterwards, paddock by paddock. If there's no coverage, the tracker stores around 30 days of data and uploads it later.
You know which implement was hooked on. A Bluetooth beacon on the tanker or spreader tells the system which implement was on the tractor during the job.
Setback zones are flagged automatically. You can draw an area on the map, such as a stream margin, a water supply or the edge of a client's block. Each time a tracked machine crosses it, an event is logged with the time, and the people you choose can be notified.

The operator logs the job on their phone. The job is recorded against the client and the paddock, with the volume applied and photos of conditions on the day. The app works without signal and syncs when it reconnects. Every later change to the job is logged.
The route and the job record back each other up. One is the machine's GPS route and the other is the operator's log, so they check each other. When the council asks, you can answer from the office in minutes. When the client asks, the proof can go out with the invoice.
FarmBackup doesn't make you compliant. Good practice does that. FarmBackup makes your good practice something you can prove.
The cheapest part of compliance
Compared with a fine that can no longer be insured, keeping the record is a small cost. See what it costs for your operation, or book a demo and we'll show you a day's work replayed on the map.
Sources
- RMA reforms: increased penalties and a ban on insurance for fines and infringement fees — Simpson Grierson
- Applying effluent to land — Waikato Regional Council
- Highly careless effluent discharge results in large fine — Waikato Regional Council, 4 February 2026
- South Waikato farmer fined for unlawful effluent discharges — Scoop, 22 May 2026
- Waihi dairy farmer fined $39,000 over effluent discharge — 1News, 4 June 2026